yeah,i kind of agree with those comments there... somehow the idea of a tangram contradicts my rather (ahem!)conventional notion of a symbol... i always thought a symbol collates different aspects together...and does not disjoin to make the form and meaning so blatant and simple... hmm...but man the criticism on that blog.Scary!
yeah,i kind of agree with those comments there... somehow the idea of a tangram contradicts my rather (ahem!)conventional notion of a symbol... i always thought a symbol collates different aspects together...and does not disjoin to make the form and meaning so blatant and simple... hmm...but man the criticism on that blog.Scary!
haha, the icograda site has a write up on the logo as well...its becoming quite a big deal i guess. Dunno why they decided to release the logo 5 whole years early??
Welcome to fellowgraphites. This blog belongs to the graphic design students of NID, India. It is intended to act as an archive of links and a lot more, all related to Graphic Design. We'd love to see some discussions. Feel free to post comments!
3 comments:
yeah,i kind of agree with those comments there...
somehow the idea of a tangram contradicts my rather (ahem!)conventional notion of a symbol...
i always thought a symbol collates different aspects together...and does not disjoin to make the form and meaning so blatant and simple...
hmm...but man the criticism on that blog.Scary!
yeah,i kind of agree with those comments there...
somehow the idea of a tangram contradicts my rather (ahem!)conventional notion of a symbol...
i always thought a symbol collates different aspects together...and does not disjoin to make the form and meaning so blatant and simple...
hmm...but man the criticism on that blog.Scary!
haha, the icograda site has a write up on the logo as well...its becoming quite a big deal i guess. Dunno why they decided to release the logo 5 whole years early??
Post a Comment